Streaming Media Patent Fight

By Deane Barker on July 18, 2003

Wired News: Porn Sites May Stream No More: If you get past the first two-thirds of this article, which is about porns sites losing a lawsuit by default, you get to this gem:

“So far, 27 companies have settled with Acacia. Those include LodgeNet Entertainment Corporation, the hotel video-on-demand service, and Virgin Radio, a streaming music firm. … Acacia claims its patents cover just about every form of digital audio and video distribution. According to Berman, these kinds of activities violate Acacia’s intellectual property rights: pushing MP3s from peer-to-peer groups, streaming newscasts from Internet radio sites and delivering movies through cable networks.”

So someone claims to have a patent on “just about every form of digital audio and video distribution”? Nice.



  1. It might be that someone has a patent for streaming but if you didn’t know it till now, there is still a basic rule of the nature says that as stronger you are you have more rights :)

    The only rational explanation for this bully action is that Microsoft and some other giants still didn�t hear about this funny story. These companies have a steady staff of layers, guarding their interests and are constantly busy fighting those, who come across their ways.

    It might be that someone has a patent about streaming. Streaming is widely implemented in Microsoft applications but in order to claim it, they would have to invest hundreds of millions of dollars in a period of longer than half of a century to win the fight in court.

    If these guys are intelligent enough and don�t want to lose their company or maybe even their own savings, they should directly deal with Microsoft, get some millions and live their lives happily to its end.

Comments are closed. If you have something you really want to say, tweet @gadgetopia.