Windows Found to Have Lower Total Cost Of 0wnz0rship

By on August 13, 2004

CNet remarks on a study that pokes a little fun at the numerous MS-funded studies that suggest that Windows has a lower TCO, while Linux silently but surely gives you cancer. The study suggests that Windows also has a lower T0t4l c05t 0f 0wnz0rship, the cost a cracker has to pay in order to t0t4lly 0wnz0r your box.

Based on their tentative data, Immunity’s researchers found that their average time to find a flaw in the Red Hat-sponsored Fedora Core 2 distribution of Linux was about six days — twice as long on average as it took to find previously unknown Windows vulnerabilities. Several factors affect that time, including better tools for finding flaws in Windows systems, better kernel-level defenses in Linux, and more known points in Windows to execute attack code, the researchers noted.

Six days is still a scary-low number when you think about it. The CNet article also doesn’t mention the severity of the exploits.



Comments are closed. If you have something you really want to say, tweet @gadgetopia.