Subtle Manipulation

Home

Measuring ‘Completeness’ to Encourage Action: David Gammel points out something I’ve always thought was brilliant.

This strikes me as a very subtle yet effective way to get your users to provide more information about themselves in their profile. Who doesn’t want to get to 100%?

I spent a lot of time trying to cultivate that third recommendation in an attempt to get my LinkedIn profile complete. I knew it was manipulative, but I just couldn’t get past the fact that my bar wasn’t at 100%.

Comments

Don’t feel bad; my profile is stuck at 55%, and it bugs the heck out of me. But after your Shelfari debacle, I’m more than a bit hesitant to give LinkedIn the keys to my GMail address book.

Dave | March 30, 2008 11:56 AM

Rebels like me react negatively to LinkIn-type judgements

John R Hall | March 30, 2008 9:24 PM

I’ve always thought that this was a great ploy by LinkedIn to encourage people to add more data. I’d even considered the idea that they would never let anyone get to 100%, they would keep adding on more requirements instead.

Joseph Scott | March 31, 2008 9:50 AM

Add a Comment

Name:
URL:

Comment:
Markdown is enabled in comments. If you have to use HTML, we allow A HREF, B, BR, P, STRONG, EM, UL, LI, and BLOCKQUOTE.
 
Comments on this site are subject to our Terms of Service